The connection between inequality and hierarchy explained
By David Preussen
“You, who cannot conceive of unity without a whole apparatus of legislators, prosecutors, attorney generals, custom house officers, policemen, you have never known what real unity is! What you call unity and centralization is nothing but perpetual chaos, serving as a basis for endless tyranny; it is the advancing of the chaotic condition of social forces as an argument for despotism–a despotism which is really the cause of the chaos.”
— Proudhon, Generell idea of the Revolution in the 19. Century
Why do we have hierarchy? Why do we have so much inequality? These are fundamental questions no one seems to ask. As long as we don’t ask the right question, we’ll only get the wrong answers.
You see, inequality and hierarchy are inter-winded with each other, there could be no inequality without hierarchy, just like there would be no hierarchy without inequality. Both, inequality and hierarchy, are what I call “social poisons”. Always tending to mutual destruction. This kind of relationship between inequality and hierarchy is called antinomy, literally counter-law, means opposition in principle or antagonism in relation.
Should I explain a little more? Just press both hands with force against each other; the relationship between the forces from your right and left arm you now have created is what is called an antinomy, two opposing forces tending to mutual destruction. The same kind of relationship exists between inequality and hierarchy/control.
Historically it all started in times of hardship, such time gave birth to what we know as class society, a society divided into classes. Out of the division into classes came inequality, a direct product of class society. The state than came into existence to contain the effects of inequality, the chaotic forces arising from social injustice. That’s the reason why we need an authoritarian state, it’s about containing the chaotic conditions arising from inequality. More inequality always requires more authoritarian control to contain it, it’s a direct relationship, just like more poverty causes more crime.
Do you get it? That’s why they push capitalism and multiculturalism. It’s to increase the inequality, the chaotic conditions which make their authoritarian rule inevitable. Think of it like you were the owner of a security company which needs crimes and fear for it’s very existence, increasing inequality would in this case be a sure way to cause more violence on the long run and thus increase your own profits. Governments can increase their own power simply by increasing inequality, it works exactly in the same way. Economical and racial inequality are the main factors behind the social chaos, usury, money lending and immigration are their main causes.
Why do you think there is Tag der offenen Tur (day of the open door) at the southern US boarder while your jobs are moving to China? You see, it’s all about increasing the inequality. Our current society is based on hierarchical rule out of inequality. Democracy is something entirely different by the way.
Why do you think most native populations and tribes get along without laws or a authoritarian state? In most primitive cultures there is simply neither much racial nor economical inequality at hand. Without inequality there is no need for so much authoritarian control. The history of my own people is a good example.
“For myself, I concur in opinion with such as suppose the people of Germany never to have mingled by inter-marriages with other nations, but to have remained a people pure, and independent, and resembling none but themselves. Hence amongst such a mighty multitude of men, the same make and form is found in all, eyes stern and blue, yellow hair, huge bodies, but vigorous only in the first onset. … The lord you cannot discern from the slave, by any superior delicacy in rearing. Amongst the same cattle they promiscuously live, upon the same ground they without distinction lie … All the enmities of your house, whether of your father or of your kindred, you must necessarily adopt; as well as all their friendships. Neither are such enmities unappeasable and permanent: since even for so great a crime as homicide, compensation is made by a fixed number of sheep and cattle, and by it the whole family is pacified to content. A temper this, wholesome to the State; because to a free nation, animosities and faction are always more menacing and perilous. In social feasts, and deeds of hospitality, no nation upon earth was ever more liberal and abounding. To refuse admitting under your roof any man whatsoever, is held wicked and inhuman. Every man receives every comer, and treats him with repasts as large as his ability can possibly furnish. When the whole stock is consumed, he who has treated so hospitably guides and accompanies his guest to the next house, though neither of them invited. Nor avails it, that they were not; they are there received, with the same frankness and humanity.” – Tacitus, on Germany (55-115a.d.)
In such cases without much inequality wannabe-authoritarian controller have to artificially cause inequality in order to set the conditions which require their authoritarian rule. It’s like a firefighter without job setting things on fire in order to create the required conditions to get a job. Jews have done not much else for the last 200 years.
Economical and racial inequality are the most effective weapons world Jewry has today. A free and multicultural society is an oxymoron, a no-place, a utopia. It’s a well kept secret that a society can just be either free or multicultural. By causing so much inequality they made it almost impossible for us to build a truly free society. Our current society would simply crumble into total chaos without their authoritarian control. Just think what would happen if we would just open all the boarders around the world, the poor people would simply flock into the rich countries and cause total social chaos in the process. The only way to open the boarders without causing so much chaos would be to remove the inequality as much as possible first. With freedom it’s the same; no equality = no freedom. Or like the Russian revolutionary Bakunin wrote; “Political Freedom without economic equality is a pretense, a fraud, a lie..”
Authoritarian control currently acts like a gate holding back the social chaos arising from inequality, just like boarders are keeping these poor people back. In order to successfully open the gate and re-gain our freedoms, the inequality behind the gate needs to be removed first.
That is why I’m against multiculturalism, it’s not because I don’t like other people, I simply know that multiculturalism and freedom are totally exclusive terms. I choose a free society over a diverse one! In a free society such basic principles would be thought in school!
~ by metadave on June 18, 2007.
Posted in Education, End Game, Philosophy/Metaphysics, Science, Solutions, Uncategorized
Tags: antinomy, awakening, Education, Enlightenment, freedom, imigration, justice, liberty, metaphysics, skeptikosexaminer